The legal issues facing county government have been changing at a rapid pace, and county government officials face a complex arena of state and federal mandates that challenge the traditional operations of county government. Although the county judge and the other four members of the commissioners court are given broad administrative powers and budgetary authority over county government operations, both federal and state statutes have eroded or muddied the county's authority and saddled it with mandates that may be difficult to fulfill without adequate funding. Complying with those laws and mandates can be a challenge, but the lawyers of Bickerstaff Heath offer years of experience with local government legal issues for assisting the county to achieve its objectives.
Whether a county is contemplating public financing options, developing infrastructure, engaging in construction, entering into interlocal agreements with other counties and cities, defending against lawsuits, or holding critical elections, the legal landscape is filled with potholes that can be avoided by county-specific legal strategies and solutions. Simple solutions found in business or general law practice frequently cannot be applied to counties due to the special nature of local government entities. No other area faces the challenge of dealing with the complex web of statutes and rulings that apply only to local governments in addition to the already complex world of commercial and business laws.
Bickerstaff Heath also serves its clients in the creation and representation of other local governmental entities that have been formed to address the growing needs of the public. Those entities include special districts and authorities for utilities, economic development, transportation, health care, navigation, and rail service. These entities also are governed by a patchwork of special and general laws and codes that pose knotty legal issues for their operations and governance.
Bickerstaff Heath provides both general counsel and special counsel services on all legal issues faced by counties and other governmental entities across Texas. Serving the needs of small and large counties requires a variety of expertise that is best provided by lawyers who understand the full extent of governmental authorities and responsibilities. Bickerstaff Heath offers an experienced group of governmental attorneys that serves counties in every area of the state. We advise county clients in all areas of public law:
- General Representation of Counties
- Open Government Law
- Public Finance
- Economic Development
- Land Use and Development
- Transportation
- Construction Law
- Elections
- Elections Challenges
- Litigation
- General Representation of Special Districts
- District Creation and Legislative Representation
- Groundwater Districts
- General Counsel and Outside Counsel
- Financing and Bond Counsel For Special Districts
MATTER EXAMPLE: Syd Falk and David Méndez are assisting a number of counties to establish county ownership of roads through a special process established by a recent statute. Through this process these counties are clarifying ownership and easement issues related to long-time county roads.
Our attorneys are partners in the county government field, actively participating in activities of the Texas Association of Counties and the associations of County Judges and Commissioners as sponsors and speakers. We also assist county clients in keeping up-to-date on relevant legal issues and offer educational credits. Our local government seminar focuses on the thorniest issues facing government officials. We produce dozens of day-long seminars on local government topics in conjunction with the Texas Leadership Institute. Held in Bastrop and in Alpine, these meaty programs have included Public Works from Start to Finish and Issues Affecting County Government. We also know that a phone call, e-mail, or fax alert is important when the legislature or courts are addressing key government topics. County governments count on Bickerstaff Heath all over Texas.
The firm has assisted clients to analyze and implement newly-created options for development of transportation infrastructure, including regional mobility authorities and pass-through toll projects. For example, Manuel O. Méndez has represented Cameron County in the creation of the Cameron County Regional Mobility Authority and also represents Chambers County in the negotiation of a pass-through toll project. In addition, the firm has assisted county and local government clients in the development of international toll bridge projects. Manuel O. Méndez and Marco Muñoz have successfully represented local government clients with respect to areas such as binational negotiations, contracting, financing, environmental, diplomatic, permitting, and regulatory and litigation matters involved in the development, construction and placement into operation of four new international toll bridges between Texas and Mexico. The firm currently represents three ongoing international toll bridge projects.
MATTER EXAMPLE: Between 1996 and 2005, we assisted Anderson, Aransas, Bastrop, Bell, Burleson, Calhoun, Cooke, Kaufman and Lavaca Counties with the process of designing and building new jail facilities.
MATTER EXAMPLE: Represented Bastrop County with their $4,745,000 Courthouse Renovation Project; assisted architect in preparation of bid documents for contractor; negotiated and prepared construction contract.
The firm has assisted in preparing hundreds of preclearance submissions to the Department of Justice for general and special elections and redistricting. We have advised counties on holding local option elections. We have helped analyze the need for bond elections, as well as organizing and coordinating them. Additionally, we have represented candidates and local governments in election contests, suits to enjoin elections, and voting rights litigation. Our Election Services team includes a former Texas Secretary of State, six experienced attorneys, and two non-lawyers: the former Deputy City Clerk of the City of Austin, who is not licensed to practice law but possess immense experience managing elections, and a GIS specialist.
The types of services provided by the Elections Group include drafting election orders, canvasses and notices, establishing and mapping election precincts, identifying and securing polling locations, determining ballot styles, obtaining DOJ preclearance, recruiting and training election officials, advising on election and campaign ethics requirements, and advising on public forum speech issues.
MATTER EXAMPLE: Between 1996 and 2004, we assisted Austin Independent School District on the election aspects of three successful bond elections in which voters authorized over $900,000,000 for school projects.
MATTER EXAMPLE: Austin Community College, Austin Independent School District, and the Barton Springs Edwards Aquifer Conservation District were assisted by the firm's Elections Services team to hold a joint election. Our services included negotiating and contracting for joint elections and elections services agreements under the Texas Election Code. Previous elections handled by this team have included as many as 11 participating political subdivisions, which requires conforming the goals and special circumstances of each entity with the various election laws governing each of the entities. The firm has handled every aspect of organizing and conducting Texas elections, from calling the election through completion of any recount.
MATTER EXAMPLE: Bruce Wasinger represented GBRA in its support of TCEQ's creation of a Priority Groundwater Management Areas in northern Bexar County.
MATTER EXAMPLE: We represented a coalition of South Texas counties in the legislative creation of the Rio Grande Authority, a river authority for the lower Rio Grande.
MATTER EXAMPLE: Doug Caroom assisted Garza and Kent counties to create the Lake Allen Henry District.
MATTER EXAMPLE: We represented the Barton Springs-Edwards Aquifer Conservation District in state court litigation challenging the validity of its authorizing legislation.
MATTER EXAMPLE: Doug Caroom assisted the Evergreen Groundwater Conservation District in drafting and adopting its rules and management plan. He also represented the District in a contested permitting proceeding before a State Office of Administrative Hearings judge.
MATTER EXAMPLE: Bill Dugat has represented the Barton Springs-Edwards Aquifer Conservation District in administrative and judicial enforcement actions against various permittees for failure to comply with district rules and permits.
MATTER EXAMPLE: We act as general counsel to three groundwater districts and one river authority (LNRA). We are outside counsel for numerous others: CRMWA, BRA, LCRA, Reeves County WID#2, and DCPC MUD.
MATTER EXAMPLE: Emily Rogers prepared a Takings Impact Assessment for CRMWA for its conjunctive use project.
MATTER EXAMPLE: Tom Pollan served as bond counsel for the Canadian River Municipal Water Authority for the issuance of bonds totaling $17,450,000 for the acquisition of the Canadian River Aqueduct from the United States Bureau of Reclamation. He also assisted in financing CRMWA salinity control project, and served as bond counsel for CRMWA's $52,825,000 bond issue for its groundwater conjunctive use project.
In addition to these ten highlighted areas of practice, the experience of Bickerstaff, Heath standing beside counties as they address the most pressing issues of this century defines our presence in every corner of the state of Texas.
|
Attorneys who practice County Law
|
||

